|
SKIP TO
Page 1
| Page 2
| Page 3
| Page 4
| Page 5
| Page 6
| References
A Hong Kong Review – How we fought corruption: Sustained anti-corruption strategy in colonial Hong Kong, an alternate perspective
 Photo © Tan Kian Khoon
Over the years, Hong Kong has built up a clean culture and is recognized
as one of the role models for fighting corruption. Syndicated and petty corruption
in the public sector has become a thing of the past and irregularities in the
private sector have been reduced substantially (Li, 2001).
There has been a radical change in the culture too, "from tolerance of corruption
to clear rejection" (Chui, 2000). In fact, some of the main reasons for
Hong Kong's success include:
- the creation of the unimpeachable anti-corruption agency in 1974, the Independent
Commission Against Corruption (the "ICAC") which was established with a well-planned long-term
strategy that uses a three-pronged attack on corruption via investigation, prevention and
education;
- the attention to all corruption reports; and
- the ability to maintain confidentiality (de Speville, 1999).
In addition, though compelled by public criticism, the recognition of
corruption as a real problem by the then British colonial government
in Hong Kong and its subsequent commitment to solving it also constituted
a major factor of success (Quah, 2004).
This "commitment," however, is not just one single policy or legislation,
but is a whole range of various complicated administrative policies,
legal initiatives, and financial tactics applied consistently and
strategically over a long period of time – hence effectively creating
an environment "suitable for fighting corruption."
In this section, we shall review from a new strategic viewpoint
the "passive commitments" of the Hong Kong colonial government in terms of:
- the local economic and social statistics for a 25-year period spanning 1967 thru 1992 and
- the behavioral patterns and theories of people.
In addition, we shall also relate the above to see how these had possibly
and indirectly contributed to make corruption a low gain and high risk crime
and how these had fostered the effectiveness of the corresponding legislations
and helped the work of the local anti-corruption agency. Last but not the least;
we will try, through our findings, to make some recommendations for the
future enhancement for the current Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (HKSARG)
in its ever on-going combat against corruption.
SKIP TO
Page 1
| Page 2
| Page 3
| Page 4
| Page 5
| Page 6
| References
|