SHORTCUT TO MAIN SECTIONS
Home  •  About this site  •  How did we once fight corruption in colonial Hong Kong?
 •  John Sinclair's Lexical Items  •  Syndicated news  •  and more to come
 Sunday, May 20 2012 8:26pm Hongkong Time

SKIP TO     Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | References

A Hong Kong Review –
How we fought corruption: Sustained anti-corruption strategy in colonial Hong Kong, an alternate perspective

Skyline of Hong Kong (c) Tan Kian Khoon
Photo © Tan Kian Khoon

Over the years, Hong Kong has built up a clean culture and is recognized as one of the role models for fighting corruption. Syndicated and petty corruption in the public sector has become a thing of the past and irregularities in the private sector have been reduced substantially (Li, 2001). There has been a radical change in the culture too, "from tolerance of corruption to clear rejection" (Chui, 2000). In fact, some of the main reasons for Hong Kong's success include:

  1. the creation of the unimpeachable anti-corruption agency in 1974, the Independent Commission Against Corruption (the "ICAC") which was established with a well-planned long-term strategy that uses a three-pronged attack on corruption via investigation, prevention and education;
  2. the attention to all corruption reports; and
  3. the ability to maintain confidentiality (de Speville, 1999).

In addition, though compelled by public criticism, the recognition of corruption as a real problem by the then British colonial government in Hong Kong and its subsequent commitment to solving it also constituted a major factor of success (Quah, 2004). This "commitment," however, is not just one single policy or legislation, but is a whole range of various complicated administrative policies, legal initiatives, and financial tactics applied consistently and strategically over a long period of time – hence effectively creating an environment "suitable for fighting corruption."

In this section, we shall review from a new strategic viewpoint the "passive commitments" of the Hong Kong colonial government in terms of:

  1. the local economic and social statistics for a 25-year period spanning 1967 thru 1992 and
  2. the behavioral patterns and theories of people.
In addition, we shall also relate the above to see how these had possibly and indirectly contributed to make corruption a low gain and high risk crime and how these had fostered the effectiveness of the corresponding legislations and helped the work of the local anti-corruption agency. Last but not the least; we will try, through our findings, to make some recommendations for the future enhancement for the current Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government (HKSARG) in its ever on-going combat against corruption.

SKIP TO     Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Page 6 | References





Informational sites by Raymond Cheng, PhD DPA

Commentary.com | TCMBasics.com | CheckDomain.name | OXLL.org


Copyright © 2001-2012 Wyith Ltd dba Commentary.com. All Rights Reserved. Copyright of selected news articles and logos belongs to respective news agencies. Read disclaimer.

SHORTCUT TO MAIN SECTIONS
Home  •  About this site  •  How did we once fight corruption in colonial Hong Kong?
 •  John Sinclair's Lexical Items  •  Syndicated news  •  and more to come

Contact the editor at raymond {dot} cheng {at} kellogg {dot} oxon {dot} org


Photo credits for top title bar, from left to right: Iza H (Work), Lukasz Gumowski (Blue Balls), Marcin Bania (Smiling and Naked), Lautaro Gonda (Milan Station), Jan Abt (Girl Taking a Picture), Daniel Tang (Hot Switch), Barbara Henry (Moriah Reading), Ralf Herrmann (Checkmate II), Marko Roeper (Led #4), Ian Russell (Girl in Downtown LA)

www.commentary.com | www.commentary.asia | www.commentary.hk | www.commentary.tw | www.commentary.sg

Special Alert! This is *NOT* the American Jewish Committee's Commentary Magazine! Special notice! This is not the American Jewish Committee's Commentary Magazine nor are we in any way affiliated with them. To visit AJC's magazine, please go to commentarymagazine.com instead, thank you.

This site is best viewed with Microsoft® Internet Explorer 6.0 or above, minimum 1024x768 16M color-depth resolution. Wyith Ltd dba Commentary.com and its personnel do not endorse external sites and are not responsible for the content of these websites. All external sites will open in a new browser window.




 
IMPORTANT NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER

This website is published and designed by Raymond Cheng, PhD DPA and reflects only and only his personal views and opinions in his individual capacity. It does not represent the views and opinions of his firm, employer(s), clients, or anyone else, and is not in any way sponsored or endorsed by any other thrid parties.

Please click here to read my full disclaimer
USMAN'S TECHNOLOGY BLOG  
Usman Khurshid on Mike McCune's HD Monitor with Paths Technize.net logo with Maartje van Caspel's Public Space
I am proud to announce that the Commentary.com website is now carrying the technology updates from Usman Khurshid's Technize.net. Usman is a network consultant and works in a mixed environment of Windows and Linux platforms. He likes to study about the latest advancements in computer technology and shares his views on his blog.

Click here to read Usman's tech blog
Subscribe to RSS feed
Photo © Usman Khurshid, Mike McCune, Maartje van Caspel
COMING 2012 – GLUCK ON SOCIALISM AND CHINA Asia (c) Robert Churchill
Photo © Robert Churchill

Professor Sidney Gluck (c) Sandi BachomI am honored to have obtained Professor Sidney Gluck's (right) permission to allow me to repost here some of his work and interview related to China and socialism. Professor Gluck is professor emertius at the New School University in New York. A classical Marxist, Gluck has been studying China for 60 years in history and modern development. He has lectured all over the country and still welcomes engagement at the age of 94 – photo © Sandi Bachom

COMING 2013 – COMPUTING CORPUS Active Network Hub (c) Phil Sigin-Lavdanski
Photo © Phil Sigin-Lavdanski

Oh, please do not get me wrong. This new section is not about using computers on or programming with a corpus, but rather I am currently constructing a new corpus based on the CACM, Communications of the Association for Computer Machinery, from January 2008 to date. As a professional grade ACM member since 1997, I have always been fascinated by some of the very conservative (and the sometimes very aggressive) words scientists use when they talk (or brag) about their new inventions or methodologies. How many of them actually come into real use? Could there be some insights we can possibly derive, especially from the linguistics perspective?

ADVERTISEMENT

BOOKMARK US WITH SOCIAL MEDIA

Digg it!  Share on Twitter  Add to Facebook  Bookmark on Google History Bookmark  Bookmark on Del.icio.us  Bookmark on Yahoo!  Reddit